National Association of Tobacco Outlets
Working to protect the rights of tobacco retailers and legal-age adult consumers.
  • About
    About NATO
    Mission Statement
    Committees
    Staff
  • NATO News
  • Legislative
    Legislative Monitor
    State Legislative Links
    Find Your Elected Officials
    Federal Excise Tax Increase Study
    State Regulatory Maps
    Cigarette Nicotine Limits Economic Impact Study
    Retail Theft Tracker
  • Tax Maps
  • FDA
    Background
    State Tax & MSA Reports
    State Tax & MSA Infographics
    Summary of FDA Deeming Regulations
    Enforcement Actions
  • Members
    Wholesale / Distributors
    Associates
  • Join
    Value of Membership
    Retailer Application
    Convenience / Chain Store Application
    Manufacturer Application
    Wholesale / Distributor Application
    Associate Application
  • Webinars
  • Local Ordinances
  • We Card
Legislative Action on State Tobacco Bills
January 10, 2017
State Legislative Update
November 9, 2016
NATO Board of Director Election Results
November 3, 2016
NATO Announces Series of Regional Educational Conferences
November 3, 2016
State Legislative Update
October 19, 2016
California Retail Members: Oppose Proposition 56
October 13, 2016
Colorado Retail Members: Oppose Amendment 72
October 13, 2016
North Dakota Retail Members: Oppose Measure 4
October 13, 2016
State Legislative Update
October 7, 2016
2016 State Tobacco Legislative Update
September 30, 2016
State Legislative Update
September 26, 2016
California Retail Members: Oppose Proposition 56
October 13, 2016

With Election Day less than four weeks away, California retail members, their employees and customers are urged to vote “No” on Proposition 56. This ballot question titled Proposition 56 would increase the California cigarette tax rate by $2.00 per pack and increase the tax rate on other tobacco products proportionately in line with the higher cigarette tax.

The reasons to vote “No” on Proposition 56 include the following:

  1. Proposition 56 would raise up to $1.4 billion in new tobacco tax revenue, a huge tax increase on a minority of the adult population that purchases tobacco products.
  2. Proposition 56 allocates just 13% of the new tobacco tax revenue to help smokers quit or keep underage individuals from starting to use tobacco products.
  3. Proposition 56 diverts up to $600 million per year from the state’s schools. California’s Constitution requires that schools receive at least 43% of any new tax increase revenue. However, Proposition 56 was written to undermine this constitutional funding guarantee, allowing hundreds of millions of dollars a year that would otherwise go to schools to instead be diverted to health insurance companies and other special interest groups.
  4. Proposition 56 increases insurance company profits because they are not required to accept additional Medi-Cal patients and are allowed, along with health care providers, to keep 82% of the new tobacco tax revenue.
  5. Proposition 56 has virtually no taxpayer accountability for how health insurance companies and other health care providers spend the new tobacco tax revenue, nor are health insurance companies subject to the new audits that Proposition 56 requires.

For more information on this ballot question, visit www.NoOnProposition56.com.

State Legislative Update
Colorado Retail Members: Oppose Amendment 72
© Copyright 2025 NATO. All Rights Reserved | david.spross@natocentral.org | Contact Us